Aaron already has an example of Sign-in With Apple up and running, because of course he has 👍
“Sample code for the Sign in with Apple API. Contribute to aaronpk/sign-in-with-apple-example development by creating an account on GitHub.”
“Sample code for the Sign in with Apple API. Contribute to aaronpk/sign-in-with-apple-example development by creating an account on GitHub.”
Aaron already has an example of Sign-in With Apple up and running, because of course he has 👍
Reposting: Aimee Free Bird Ault on Twitter
“👋🏻Hi Twitter. If you or someone you know is looking to hire a seasoned and fairly humble senior Ruby developer, please let me know. I was very unexpectedly laid off as part of a mass-downsizing today. I have 15 years of development experience, 5 in particular with Ruby on Rails.”
Yeah, I’m OK with this too.
One thing that seems to be getting glossed over in the linked thread – it’s only mandatory to include the option, if the app offers other third-party logins. If you have your own login system then you do not have to add anything. That… seems reasonable?
““This is #TheGrowlyDarks project I want to kickstart shortly.
Mental arithmetic free, designed for dyscalculia, ADHD, ADD, vision impaired, and forms of neurodiversity that are a barrier to playing #ttrpgs games!””
Went in and picked what I’m going to be doing for @warhammeraberdeenofficial’s Path to Glory and Summer of Hobby. Now I just need to wait on those Contrast paints to be released!
“A new book explains why digital activism helps conservatives more than liberals.”
In terms of the actual ideology itself, I do think there’s something about the nature of conservatism that makes it easier to promote online. Conservatives tend to focus on simple, clear messages around freedom in particular. The left tends to focus on this general idea of fairness.
Conservatives are generally monolithic in their attacks on, say, Obamacare. The left wants a diverse array of voices. The left tends to want to include a lot of different people and a lot of different issues, and the result is a more muddled message that is just harder to communicate.
“…then maybe they deserve this drivel, says a Macedonian copy-paste/turn-it-into-clickbait-bile writer who says it’s all about the money.”
… it’s all about the clicks. It’s all about the ad revenue. It doesn’t matter how preposterous the content is: what matters is that somebody – or many somebodies – open the articles and generate ad impressions.